Document Type


Publication Date



As part of this lecture series on lawyering in the public interest, the author decided to talk about his pro bono involvement in the medical cannabis case of Gonzales v. Raich, which he and three other lawyers brought on behalf of Angel Raich and Diane Monson. There are three topics discussed in this lecture: the first is how the author got involved in doing this, which is a question he is asked all the time; the second is to describe the theory they took to the Supreme Court, which prevailed in the Ninth Circuit but was ultimately rejected by the Court on a vote of six to three; and finally, because the case still continues, the author explains their current claims, which are based on the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and on the Ninth Amendment. In particular, he discusses how our current theory relates to constitutional law class teachings. The author argues that the problems faced in his case illustrate the weakness of the current approach to using the Due Process Clause to protect liberty and why a "presumption of liberty," which he has argued for in his scholarship, would be preferable to the current approach.

Publication Citation

22 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 29-45 (2006)