Even though we are discussing a case that was not decided on the merits, Nike v. Kasky is an important case because it crystallizes two of the essential critiques about the commercial speech doctrine, critiques that have run through this doctrine from before its advent in 1976 to today. The fundamental debate Nike triggered over what constitutes "commercial speech" and how strictly commercial speech should be regulated is still being played out - not just in the academy, but also in the courts on a day-to-day basis. So this is a timely and important topic.
30 Seattle U. L. Rev. 895-930 (2007)
Scholarly Commons Citation
Collins, Ronald; Lopez, Mark; Piety, Tamara; and Vladeck, David C., "Corporations and Commercial Speech" (2007). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. Paper 544.