<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SCI Papers &amp; Reports</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Georgetown University Law Center All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers</link>
<description>Recent documents in SCI Papers &amp; Reports</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 01:48:36 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Supreme Court Institute Annual Report, 2012-2013</title>
<link>http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 08:30:52 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During the 2012-2013 academic year–corresponding to the U.S. Supreme Court’s October Term (OT) 2012–the Supreme Court Institute (SCI) provided moot courts for advocates in 100% of the cases heard by the Court this Term, offered a variety of programs related to the Supreme Court, and hosted several delegations of foreign visitors. A list of all SCI moot courts held in OT 2012–arranged by argument sitting and date of moot and including the name and affiliation of each advocate and the number of student observers–follows the narrative portion of this report.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Supreme Court Institute Annual Report, 2010-2011</title>
<link>http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:43:17 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During the 2010-2011 academic year--corresponding to the U.S. Supreme Court’s October Term (OT) 2010--the Supreme Court Institute (SCI) provided moot courts for advocates in over 93% of the cases heard by the Court this Term; sponsored a range of programming related to the Supreme Court; and hosted delegations of lawyers and judges visiting from Britain, Rwanda, Kosovo, Korea, China, and Germany. A list of all SCI moot courts held in OT 2010, listed by sitting and date of moot and including the name and affiliation of each advocate and the number of student observers, follows the narrative portion of this report.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Supreme Court Institute Annual Report, 2011-2012</title>
<link>http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/sci_papers/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:43:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During the 2011-2012 academic year--corresponding to the U.S. Supreme Court’s October Term (OT) 2011--the Supreme Court Institute (SCI) provided moot courts for advocates in over 94% of the cases heard by the Court this Term and offered over a dozen programs related to the Supreme Court. All SCI moot courts held in OT 2011, listed by sitting and date of moot, and including the name and affiliation of each advocate and the number of student observers, follows the narrative portion of this report.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
