Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
Abstract
Democracy and administrative law concern ideas of governance, legitimacy, and accountability. With the growth of bureaucracy and regulation, many democratic theorists would argue that administrative law mechanisms are essential to achieving democratic objectives. This article considers the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) contribution to governance both in terms of global administrative law and democracy. In relation to administrative law, it first explores the extent to which the WTO’s own dispute settlement process contributes to this area. Second, it considers the operation of administrative law principles embedded within the WTO Agreements on Members. For example, the WTO Agreements require that certain laws be administered “in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner.” This obligation was recently considered by the Appellate Body, but uncertainty remains about the scope this provision has to permit WTO panels to review domestic administrative practices. In relation to the WTO’s contribution to democracy, this article first considers the challenges and limitations of the current system of decision making within the WTO and compares it to democratic theory. Second, it examines how democracies comply with the findings of WTO dispute settlement tribunals and how compliance could be improved. It concludes by speculating on the implications of this discussion for public international law more broadly.
Publication Citation
46 Alta. L. Rev. 1061-1080 (2008-2009)
Scholarly Commons Citation
Mitchell, Andrew D. and Sheargold, Elizabeth, "Global Governance: The World Trade Organization's Contribution" (2009). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 386.
https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/386
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons